
Neo Rauch, Aprilnacht, 2011, oil on canvas, 118 1/8” x 98 3/8”
From ArtPulse Magazine, Stephen Knudsen writes:
The 10-foot-tall April Night
breaks ranks by reeling back into something calm and quiet. Reasons for
this are difficult to deduce, as Neo Rauch has become increasingly
guarded about his personal iconography. Though he understands the
impulse to have his rhetorical inventory explained, ultimately he feels
the work best reveals its intellectual and visceral evocations over time
in non-verbal space. Speaking with Hanna Schouwink, gallery
partner and long-time advocate of Rauch, one gets more ringside clues
into the work. She spent time with the artist in his studio while this
body of work was in production. Ms. Schouwink confirmed Neo Rauch’s
concerted intention to pare down April Night, remarking that originally there were three figures in the painting. The calm in April Night feels like a good exhale-a counterpoint to the super-packed and active imagery of the artist’s other paintings.
In April Night, the building,
excavating, carrying and pulling of a typical Rauch painting is reduced
to thinking. The two figures lounge on stumps, communing with an owl and
an owl’s head-not unlike the bizarre Max Beckmann paintings with
figures holding fish in unholy ways. All of his work acknowledges the
limitations and yet the great will power in human energy, and
interpreting his iconography at that starting point is often effective.
The owl can be seen as the wide-eyed
hunter in search of inspiration. The woman and man, with their eyes
closed, are trying to decipher and process that inspiration. They
signify the artist as hunter, with paintbrushes placed in the falconry
gloves. However, sometimes there is no inspiration. Sometimes the artist
finds it. Rauch does not stop there, because the thinking and the
introspection are written in some code in nature. Stumps make letters on
the ground, and branches seem to spell something out in the sky. It
does not matter what the message is other than some kind of information
about to ignite.
Neo Rauch has lived most of the 51 years
of his life in or near Leipzig, Germany, the city of his birth. Even
while East Germany was communist, he stayed and was conditioned in a way
that those artists who left for the free West could never be. He
witnessed the limping economy of communist East Germany (GDR) and the
sprawl of uninspired gray concrete that was the Berlin Wall. He saw
Leipzig poison itself with industrial waste, and he experienced the
physical and psychological repression-all of this constant until the
euphoric reunification of Germany when he was 30 years old. In the
1980s, Rauch studied painting at Leipzig’s Academy of Visual Arts,
choosing to embrace the figure in painting even though it was certainly
distasteful that the figure was key to Social Realism, the
GDR-sanctioned art. Indeed, signifiers of coping with repression, as he
experienced it, populate his works. In April Night, the figures
wear the coats of East German border guards-a nod to the past and the
long-vanquished wall. The man also wears guard boots, but as a
21st-century fashion update the woman’s boots are pink. . . .
. . . . April Night evokes the
idea of thought, both intellectually and viscerally. We intellectualize
the thinking figures, but we also feel the invitation to meditate
through the formal qualities of the work. The painting plays
down Mr. Rauch’s characteristic wild, graphic-like design, and he gets
the idea of thought across in a new way, here, by allowing figures,
objects and ground to tonally merge more than usual. In a sense, a
little Leonardo sfumato has taken hold, and I am not simply speaking
just of the little smoke from the fire. Forms dissolve in the atmosphere
of twilight. This is a quiet color language that speaks to the
electrical impulses of thinking, which are akin to the voltage through
the power line and April’s near emergence into a Northern European
spring.
Even the process of the painting is
about a stream of thought let loose. Rauch works without any preparatory
drawings and photographic mediation, starting with an object or face
and letting it evolve organically. In a recent interview with Rita
Pokorny, Mr. Rauch said that hopefully the work becomes
“an animal, a living thing…As soon as I have the feeling that the thing
has blood circulating through it, a nervous system, a skeleton, then
questions as to the message become completely marginal.”2 Rauch clearly wants the viewer to come away moved on a gut level rather than just an intellectual level.