From BLDGBLOG:
BLDGBLOG: I’m curious about the vocabulary that you use to describe this new “post-urban geography” of global slums: regional corridors, polycentric webs, diffuse urbanism,
etc. I’m wondering if you’ve found any consistent forms or structures
now arising, as cities turn away from centralized, geographically
obvious locations, becoming fractal, slum-like sprawl.
Davis:
First of all, the language with which we talk about metropolitan
entities and larger-scale urban systems is already eclectic because
urban geographers avidly debate these issues. I think there’s little
consensus at all about the morphology of what lies beyond the classical
city.
The most important debates really arose through
discussions of urbanization in southern China, Indonesia, and southeast
Asia – and that was about the nature of peri-urbanization on the
dynamic periphery of large Third World cities.
BLDGBLOG: And "peri-urbanization" means what?
Davis:
It’s where the city and the countryside interpenetrate. The question
is: are you, in fact, looking at a snapshot of a very dynamic or
perhaps chaotic process? Or will this kind of hybrid quality be
preserved over any length of time? These are really open questions.
There
are several different discussions here: one on larger-order urban
systems – similar to the Atlantic seaboard or Tokyo-Yokohama, where
metropolitan areas are linked in continuous physical systems. But then
there’s this second debate about the spill-over into the countryside,
this new peri-urban reality, where you have very complex mixtures of slums – of poverty – crossed with dumping grounds for people expelled from the center – refugees.
Yet amidst all this you have small, middle class enclaves, often new
and often gated. You find rural laborers trapped by urban sweatshops,
at the same time that urban settlers commute to work in agricultural
industries.
This, in a way, is the most interesting – and least-understood – dynamic of global urbanization. As I try to explain in Planet of Slums,
peri-urbanism exists in a kind of epistemological fog because it’s not
well-studied. The census data and social statistics are notoriously
incomplete.