Marcelo Ballvé writes on his essay at The Quarterly Conversation regarding the playful but unknown Macedonio, undoubtedly one of Borges' greatest influences:
Humor was one of the hallmarks of Macedonio’s writing—a refined and
cerebral humor typically flavored with paradox (in one piece he
describes a man who is always rushing around so as to be the first one
to arrive late). The affinity for the paradoxical proposition is one of
the many ways in which Borges took after his old friend, but hardly the
only one. Both men were enamored of speculative philosophy, and
arguably it was Macedonio who was responsible for making a
metaphysician out of Borges. Both writers were incessant explorers of a
handful of themes: the inexistence of the individual personality, the
elastic nature of time, the permeability of waking life to dreams and
vice-versa; one might say: the instability of reality in general. In
both writers’ work the supposedly bedrock concepts by which we live are
revealed to be unstable isotopes, slippery and layered, none being in
essence what they appear to be and all of course eminently moldable,
especially within the pages of a story, poem, or essay.
There is an ongoing debate in Argentine literary circles about the
extent to which Borges was influenced by Macedonio, an eccentric genius
who spent the final three decades of his life drifting through Buenos
Aires boardinghouses and country hermitages, absorbed in writing and
thinking. Some critics believe that without Macedonio’s influence, the
Borges we know would have never existed. Noé Jitrik, who might be
described as the dean of academic literary critics in Argentina, said
last year in an interview with Buenos Aires’s leading newspaper,
Clarín, that “Borges is a product of Macedonio.”3
For other critics, Borges’s friendship with Macedonio is
instrumental, but hardly determinant. They point out that Borges
published his famous short stories in the 1940s, a decade or more after
the period in which he was closest to Macedonio. Also, Borges’s own
reading appetites were omnivorous and prodigious: Who’s to say whether
he absorbed this or that idea from Macedonio or from a tome in his own
library? Also, they regard the debate as somewhat spurious: even if the
fodder for Borges’s iconic short stories like “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis
Tertius” or “The Circular Ruins” came via Macedonio’s influence or idea
bank, it’s certainly Borges’s consummate art as a stylist and
storyteller that enabled him to fashion flawless prose from the
material.
Whatever the outcome of this critical debate, if there is one, it’s
clear Macedonio left a deep imprint on Borges, one of the 20th
century’s great writers. And yet Macedonio Fernández’s name and his
work are hardly known outside Argentina. What’s needed is a proper
estimation of Macedonio’s legacy; toward this, it’s still useful to
examine his friendship with the much better-known Borges, as well as
the ideas they decanted together amidst the general intellectual
ferment of 1920s Buenos Aires.
More